Technology and Asylum Procedures
After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures across Europe, new technologies are actually reviving these systems. Via lie detection tools analyzed at the edge to a program for validating documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of systems is being used by asylum applications. This article explores just how these solutions have reshaped the ways asylum procedures will be conducted. This reveals just how asylum seekers happen to be transformed into obligated hindered techno-users: They are asked to comply with a series https://ascella-llc.com/how-to-pace-yourself-in-online-learning/ of techno-bureaucratic steps and to keep up with unstable tiny within criteria and deadlines. This obstructs their particular capacity to understand these devices and to go after their right for safety.
It also displays how these technologies are embedded in refugee governance: They accomplish the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a whirlwind of dispersed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by simply hindering these people from being able to access the stations of protection. It further argues that examines of securitization and victimization should be along with an insight in to the disciplinary mechanisms of the technologies, in which migrants will be turned into data-generating subjects whom are regimented by their reliability on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal expertise, the article argues that these systems have an natural obstructiveness. There is a double effect: even though they assist with expedite the asylum procedure, they also produce it difficult designed for refugees to navigate these systems. They are simply positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes all of them vulnerable to illegitimate decisions made by non-governmental stars, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their instances. Moreover, they will pose new risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in incorrect or discriminatory outcomes.
